‎💥 Earn ₦5k Daily Using Just Your Smartphone & Whats App! ‎No pay ments. No hidden charges. 100% free and legit! ‎ ‎📲 Simply search @dominusupdates on Tele gram to get instant access to the link, full guide, and daily earning opportunities. ‎ ‎💼 Stop scrolling and start earning! ‎Let your phone make money for you today!

𝐆𝐨𝐨𝐝 𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲𝐨𝐧𝐞! ‎Here’s a simple and FREE way to start earning extra income using just your smartphone and WhatsApp, no payments, no hidden charges! ‎ ‎You can start earning in just 3 easy steps: ‎✅ Register ‎✅ Connect your WhatsApp ‎✅ Start earning daily! ‎ ‎To get started, head over to Telegram and search for “@𝐝𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐬𝐮𝐩𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬”. ‎You’ll find the link, step-by-step guide, and a video showing you exactly how to begin. ‎ ‎👉 Don’t forget to join the channel so you stay updated with the latest legit, free-paying opportunities. ‎Absolutely no payment required it’s 100% FREE and legit! ‎

A Wrinkle in Time_360P

this movie is nice

Meg Murray (Storm Reid) and her little brother Charles Wallace (Deric McCabe) embark on a cosmic journey to find their missing father (Chris Pine). Joined by Meg's classmate Calvin O'Keefe (Levi Miller) and guided by the three mysterious astral travelers known as Mrs. Whatsit (Reese Witherspoon), Mrs. Who (Mindy Kaling) and Mrs. Which (Oprah Winfrey), the children brave a dangerous journey to a planet that possesses all of the evil in the universe. Our take: It's pretty enough to see in theaters. Post credit scene? No. While Wrinkle has its flaws and it may miss a few marks, it is ultimately an enjoyable 109 minutes. Director Ava DuVernay takes the viewers on a journey and if they allow themselves to suspend their disbelief and remember what it is like to be a child, it's an undeniably gratifying, beautiful, and inspired movie. First of all, Disney stretched their production budget as far as they needed to and it is clear that no expense was spared. From the celestial couture of the "Mrs." and their frequent extravagant costume changes to the sweeping CGI landscapes and the shimmering waves of the "tesser" this production team really outdid itself in spectacular fashion. The visuals alone make it worthwhile and certainly worthy of a trip to the theater. There's no denying that Wrinkle is a story that played well when it was written originally in the 1960's, nestled in the pages of a book that you might have read in the 4th grade. It's an easy read, but a hard movie to bring to the screen. The plot of the book is choppy, and the film stayed true to that, making sharp jumps from mesmerizing planet to planet, as well as scene to scene. There are some departures from the source material that seemed to be an attempt at overcoming the issues with the narrative therein, but it was clear that it hurt more than it helped. And while there weren't any gaping holes in the plot, there are quite a few moments that don't seem to make a whole lot of sense - even though we've read the book. But bridging the gaps in the narrative seemed to take a backseat to reinforcing the overall themes of the film, and perhaps that's okay. The end result is a film that's completely digestible, regardless of the issues it might have. Every performance is strong, the message is powerful, and it makes strides for diversity and representation. As we said in our Annihilation review, we are all for smart, POC women taking the screen in roles as doctors and scientists, and in this case, a twelve-year-old physics prodigy that learns to love her natural hair. Featuring: An immaculate performance by Reese Witherspoon. And one cannot ignore Disney's typical outstanding ability to sound mix, perfectly matching the orchestral arrangements to the mood in every scene, down to the second.

Wow. Something went wrong here. For a movie with the backing of Disney and all the resources that they poses, they must have turned a blind eye to this film, or they must have tried to manipulate and control it super tightly. This movie shocked me with how bad it was, and how Disney would release a movie this bad. They don't do it often. From start to finish, this movie is disorderly, and confusing. Maybe because I didn't read the book, but I shouldn't have to read the book in order to enjoy the movie. The actors all seemed to lack chemistry and understanding of the role. The three children just couldn't carry the plot along. It was a disaster around every corner. A Wrinkle in Time could easily be turned into a rated R film in my opinion, the one thing holding it back was the fact that it was kids and Disney. But had this been Tim Burton like Alice in Wonderland, well it would have been better directed, but it would have set in on a specific style and flow. A Wrinkle in Time never really planted its feet into a specific feel. It seemed to take itself super seriously, but what was happening on screen didn't match up. The score really didn't help. The movie was scored as a dramatic, serious, epic, however, on screen it was kids running around to "save the world". The effects were beyond cheesy. I countlessly had flashbacks to the fantastic hit "Spy Kids 3: Game Over" and its partner "Shark Boy and Lava Girl". In all regards, this movie could rival those movies on the Disney Channel, but this one is too messed up and twisted for kids to even enjoy it. They managed to make a movie that both adults and children could dislike. Disney seems to achieve first still today.

I'm not one with a need to post youtube videos or Amazon reviews sharing my thoughts on every little subject. Once in a blue moon, I feel compelled. I walked out of this movie with the same feeling as I did in 2013 walking out of Movie 43: a strong desire to ask everyone involved in its production (in particular, Hugh Jackman) to ask, "Why?" As in, "Why did you agree to this project? Was it part of a multi-movie contractual agreement? Did they let you read the script before you committed? Why?" I'm guessing this film started off as a low budget Disney original movie that got upgraded to the big screen for ... reasons. The CGI is distracting and doesn't enhance. The dialogue seems to be written by a 6 year old with an overly simplistic outlook on life. The characters one dimensional. I'm unfamiliar with the 1962 novel so maybe it's hampered by trying to be a faithful recreation ...? This film got on my radar many months ago because of some commentary around the diversity of those involved in its production. As a concept: respect. To those in marketing: please don't oversell that aspect, lest you set the movement back 20 years.

I had such high expectations for this and I rooted for it when the trailer came out. I have never read the book so I am not comparing it to that. I'm evaluating this strictly as a movie to be enjoyed watching and it was BORING.... this is not Disney magic. The movie was boring and bland despite all that CGI and color and costumes. Sad and missed opportunity to make something really good.

Might as well have been a Michael Bay Transformers movie; lovely special effects and visiuals, and everything else pretty much sucked. First and foremost, if you are telling the story of a 60 year old literary classic that has been required reading in many school systems for decades, you should probably stick to the story, rather than making your own BS up. Actor performances were either too over-the-top or shockingly sub-par, the plot they chose to cobble together blew chunks, direction was either bad or no one was listening. Yeah, it was a disaster. And then all the SJW BS. I go to movies to get away from garbage like that. If I want to be preached at, I'll go to church. Overall, I saw this for free, and I still over-paid.

I'm confused how so much money was put into something the director clearly couldn't care less about. Only Storm Reid seemed to put an effort into her acting. Oprah and Reese Witherspoon were dull but that seemed what the director desired. Mindy Kaling was annoying and distracting as her awful acting took you out of the movie experience. I just don't know how the director shot this and decided "yes that's a good take." The adults in this film either mail it in or are just not talented enough for their role.